Message-ID: <5115B27EDC2BD311892800C0DFEE3FC318EA1B@mail.irin.org.za>
From: IRIN <IRIN-SA@irin.org.za>
To: Southern Africa Readers <subs@irin.org.za>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 16:44:27 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: ANGOLA: IRIN Focus on press freedom fears [2000911]
Precedence: bulk
Sender: IRIN Africa English Service <africa-english@ocha.unon.org>


ANGOLA: IRIN Focus on press freedom fears

[This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations]

LUANDA, 11 September (IRIN) - Freedom of expression in Angola looks set to
be 
squeezed even further under a draft press law which has been described as 
"dictatorial", "contradictory" and "regressive" by the independent local
media. 

Many journalists are in uproar over the proposed law which was thrown open
for 
debate six weeks ago. They have the support of the Committee to Protect
Journalists 
(CPJ) which is appealing to the Angolan government to withdraw it.

"If passed, this law will make it practically impossible for journalists in
Angola 
to cover any matter relating to the country's political life without risking

incarceration," said CPJ executive director, Ann Cooper.

The CPJ stressed that an adequate press law should aim to protect rather
than
punish critical journalism. In the case of Angola's proposed press law, it
"entirely fails on all accounts" alleged the freedom of expression watchdog.


Articles of concern

The 19-page draft bill includes 81 articles, of which Angolan journalists
have criticised too many to list. Among the most worrying, however, article
57 guarantees presidential immunity to criticism. Anyone who "publishes,
divulges or reproduces news or facts for the national or foreign press which
attack the honour or reputation of the President" will be imprisoned for
two to eight years. 

Article 78 allows the authorities the right to decide who can be a
journalist.
Article 25 gives the authorities the power to seize or ban publications at
their discretion. Foreign publications can also be banned by the courts
(Article 62) if they "risk public order, violate the rights of individuals
or repeatedly incite the practice of crimes". 

Journalists who are arrested may be held for 30 days before charges are
filed (Article 71) and "proceedings for crimes of press abuse have an
urgent nature even when there is no arrested culprit". Article 67 has also
raised an eyebrow. It states that journalists can be prosecuted within a
two-year period from the date of publication. 

Bill opened for debate

On 27 July, when the new law was thrown open for debate, the vice
minister for social communications, Manuel Augusto, said "we would like it
if the contribution and consensus could be as broad as possible". At the
time, the secretary-general of the Union of Angolan Journalists, Miguel de
Carvalho Wadjimbi, said the invitation to journalists and Angolan society
to participate in the debate was welcome. 

"This is an excellent opportunity for journalists as a whole to air their
views so that the new bill reflects our views," he told state radio, 'Radio
Nacional'.

But according Mario Paiva, a freelance journalist who writes for the 
independent weekly journal, 'Agora', the draft law reveals "conservative 
trends" within the ruling MPLA party: "These trends are connected to the 
nomenclature and the entourage around 'the power' who fear that more 
democracy or freedom of expression could allow a wider exposure of the 
regime's wounds." 

Aguiar Dos Santos, director of 'Agora', went one step further and alleged 
that the bill had been drawn up to protect President Jose Eduardo Dos
Santos. 
He noted the President has had an "annus horribilis" including several
well-publicised allegations of corruption against him, his family and
government members. 

The draft law also includes several articles pertaining to the economic and
financial freedom of the media. Article 15 states that press organs must
publish the source of "self and borrowed capital." During a recent debate
about the new law, Aguiar Dos Santos argued that if the press must adhere
to such laws, so should other areas of business in Angola, such as the
notoriously secretive oil and diamonds sectors. 

Journalism versus sensationalism

Within the state-owned media, journalists have been a little more guarded
with their comments about the new law. In an editorial in late July, 'Jornal
De Angola', the only daily newspaper in Angola, described the press law as,
"one of the basic presuppositions of democracy". Quoting the minister of
social communications, Hendrik Vaal Neto, it stated that the debate
"symbolises the common desire that we are going to build a country, each
time more harmonious". 

Last week, during a popular television chat-show, several
journalists from the state-owned media expressed their opinions on the media
in Angola. Joao Ligio who works for state-owned TPA, Angola's only
television corporation, argued that there is greater freedom in Angola
today than ever before. 

"Today," said Ligio, "fortunately, we have the opportunity to compare and
make references between the state organs and some private [ones]. Today,
society is already armoured with the possibility to watch certain debates
in which we can follow diverse opinions. Therefore, there is already
respect for difference. This is a principle that yesterday we didn't have."

Another point raised during the programme is the view that too many
reporters in Angola mix journalism with sensationalism. "It's a serious
error," said Antonio Campos from 'Radio Nacional'. 

Alex Vines, a seasoned Angola observer who works for Human Rights Watch,
admits 
that "standards of media in Angola are low". He said that journals like the
popular 
private newspaper, 'Folha Oito', used to be much better. "The media needs to
wake 
up to the fact that it needs to professionalise," Vines told IRIN.

Vines however, argued that media standards in Angola are the product of
what he calls a history of oppression. It is because of this that the new
draft
law is such a concern. He stated that parts of the proposed bill
"criminalise opinion and expression". 

[ENDS]

IRIN-SA - Tel: +27-11 880 4633
Fax: +27-11 447 5472
Email: irin-sa@irin.org.za 


[This item is delivered in the "africa-english" service of the UN's IRIN
humanitarian information unit, but may not necessarily reflect the views
of the United Nations. For further information, free subscriptions, or
to change your keywords, contact e-mail: irin@ocha.unon.org or Web:
http://www.reliefweb.int/IRIN . If you re-print, copy, archive or re-post
this item, please retain this credit and disclaimer. Reposting by commercial
sites requires written IRIN permission.]

Copyright (c) UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs 2000
 

Subscriber: zdwf-@t-online.de
Keyword: ANGOLA